Arsenal’s victory over West Ham was marked by a controversial VAR decision. A goal scored by West Ham was disallowed after VAR identified a foul on Arsenal’s goalkeeper, David Raya. The incident has sparked debate, especially given Arsenal’s own history with set-piece plays.
VAR Intervention Decides West Ham Game
The disallowed goal occurred during a corner. Jarrod Bowen delivered the ball into a crowded penalty area. A melee ensued, followed by a shot that appeared to give West Ham the lead.
However, the video assistant referee, Darren England, intervened. The VAR review took time due to the presence of five potential fouls within the mass of bodies.
Breaking Down the Potential Fouls
The VAR’s decision was subject to scrutiny, given the magnitude of the moment. One potential foul involved Tomas Soucek and Kai Havertz. Soucek was climbing over the back of Havertz, who ended up on the floor.
The VAR would have considered that the players were not in the area where the ball was going to land. Also, Soucek was facing the ball. The VAR would have likely allowed play to continue regarding this particular incident.
Irony of Arsenal’s Set-Piece Prowess
There is irony in the situation. Arsenal have been known for their set-piece prowess this season. 31% of their league goals have come from set-pieces.
The VAR intervention had major repercussions for both Arsenal’s title chances and West Ham’s hopes. Ultimately, the Gunners claimed a 1-0 win.
Set-piece drama has been a defining feature of this Premier League season. Grappling, pushing, pulling, and wrestling have become constant elements.