The appointment of Mike Schmitz has sparked conversation. Attention has turned to past decisions, specifically the drafting of Yang Hansen.
Hansen Yang’s Trajectory: Too Early to Judge?
One viewpoint suggests that it is too early to pass judgement on Hansen Yang. Comparisons are being drawn with the early careers of Nikola Jokic, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Dirk Nowitzki and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. It is argued that some players take time to develop. The suggestion is that if Yang becomes an All-Star in 2030, the pick will be seen as a stroke of genius.
Another argument suggests that other teams may have been interested in drafting Yang. One commentator said that a team could have been ready to take him with the next pick.
However, a contrasting opinion points out differences between Hansen’s rookie year and those of Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander. It is noted that Jokic was unusually impactful as a rookie. Gilgeous-Alexander averaged 29 minutes in a playoff series during his first year. Hansen, in contrast, played only 300 minutes.
One observer stated Hansen “looked lost”.
Draft Strategy and Potential Misses
The discussion also touches upon the complexities of draft strategy. One opinion suggests that the idea of trading down to acquire assets is not always feasible. A deal requires a willing partner. The Wizards’ selection of Johnny Davis is used as an example of a potentially poor draft decision.
One person described the Johnny Davis pick as “one bad draft pick”.
Schmitz’s Strengths and Dallas’s Existing Structure
Schmitz’s comprehensive analysis of prospects at DraftExpress has been recognised. One person stated they were always impressed with this.
There is hope that Matt Riccardi and Michael Finley will remain with the Mavericks. The suggestion is that they can work effectively together. Riccardi and Finley’s loyalty to the team is seen as a positive sign.
The story of Hansen Yang is not yet written. Time will tell if the pick was genius.